Main Menu

Flex Ltd.



Attention investors who purchased shares of Flex Ltd. between January 26, 2017 and April 26, 2018:

Rigrodsky & Long is investigating claims brought in a securities fraud class action complaint against Flex Ltd. ("Flex") concerning whether Flex and certain of the Company's directors and/or officers made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose materially adverse facts during the period January 26, 2017 and April 26, 2018, inclusive (the "Class Period"), concerning Flex's business, operations and prospects. These misrepresentations and omissions artificially inflated the price of Flex's stock throughout the Class Period.

Press Release

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. announces that a complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Flex Ltd. (“Flex or the “Company”) (NASDAQ GS: FLEX) between January 26, 2017 and April 26, 2018, inclusive (the “Class Period”), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”).

If you purchased shares of Flex during the Class Period and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Seth D. Rigrodsky or Timothy J. MacFall at Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1220, Wilmington, DE 19801, by telephone at (888) 969-4242, by e-mail at, or at       

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and omitted materially adverse facts, about the Company’s business, operations and prospects.  Specifically, the Complaint alleges that the defendants concealed from the investing public: (1) that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were materially weak and deficient; (2) that the Company had improperly accounted for obligations in a customer contract and certain related reserves; and, (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s financial statements and statements about Flex’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.  As a result of defendants’ alleged false and misleading statements, the Company’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.

According to the Complaint, on April 26, 2018, Flex issued a press release disclosing that the Company’s Audit Committee, with the assistance of independent outside counsel, was investigating allegations by an employee that the Company improperly accounted for obligations in a customer contract and certain related reserves.

On this news, shares of Flex declined over 21%, closing at $13.03 per share on April 27, 2018, on heavy trading volume.

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 4, 2019.  A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.  Any member of the proposed class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., with offices in Delaware, New York, and California, has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of investors and achieved substantial corporate governance reforms in numerous cases nationwide, including federal securities fraud actions, shareholder class actions, and shareholder derivative actions.

Attorney advertising.  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Back to Page